IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/chf/rpseri/rp2655.html

Taker vs. Maker Arbitrage

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Gortan

    (University of Basel; Swiss Finance Institute)

  • Angelo Ranaldo

    (University of Basel - Faculty of Business and Economics; Swiss Finance Institute)

Abstract

Arbitrage is canonically viewed as liquidity-taking: arbitrageurs exploit discrepancies between assets with identical payoffs by taking liquidity on both legs, i.e. taker arbitrage. We show that arbitrageurs can instead provide liquidity on one leg of a payoff-equivalent position and take liquidity on the other, i.e. maker arbitrage. Using more than eight million arbitrage transactions from a leading prediction market, we find that more than half of arbitrage bundles are maker arbitrage, executed by more sophisticated traders bearing limited execution risk. Exploiting the introduction of a taker fee, which burdens taker arbitrage more than twice as heavily as maker arbitrage, we find that the price deviations required for profitable trading increase substantially more for taker than for maker arbitrage. Arbitrage thus emerges not only as a force that corrects mispricing but as a channel of liquidity provision.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Gortan & Angelo Ranaldo, 2026. "Taker vs. Maker Arbitrage," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 26-55, Swiss Finance Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:chf:rpseri:rp2655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=7269858
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D47 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Market Design
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chf:rpseri:rp2655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ridima Mittal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fameech.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.