IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cgd/wpaper/722.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Economic Returns to Foundational Literacy and Numeracy: Evidence from Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Lee Crawfurd

    (Center for Global Development)

Abstract

Despite rapid increases in access to school in low- and middle-income countries, learning outcomes remain extremely poor. This has led to calls for a new policy focus on ensuring foundational literacy and numeracy skills. Yet we have little direct, causal evidence on the long-term effects of investing in foundational skills in the early years of school. In this paper, we estimate the relationship between early-grade skills and adult earnings, using longitudinal data from the Indonesia Family Life Survey. Individuals are tested in foundational literacy and numeracy between the ages of 7 and 12 and then followed through multiple survey rounds to adulthood between the ages of 24 and 29. After adjusting for family background in childhood, a one standard deviation difference in foundational skills is associated with an 11 percent increase in adult earnings. This effect is mediated in part but not primarily by completed schooling. Those with higher foundational skills as children are less likely to have had children themselves by age 24-29. We don’t see correlations with other health outcomes. If the associated relationship can be interpreted as causal, this magnitude of returns implies a large positive benefit-cost ratio for investments in foundational skills.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee Crawfurd, 2025. "The Economic Returns to Foundational Literacy and Numeracy: Evidence from Indonesia," Working Papers 722, Center for Global Development.
  • Handle: RePEc:cgd:wpaper:722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cgdev.org/publication/economic-returns-foundational-literacy-and-numeracy-evidence-indonesia?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cgd:wpaper:722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publications Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cgdevus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.