IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cgd/wpaper/579.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Should Governments and Donors Prioritize Investments in Foundational Literacy and Numeracy?

Author

Listed:
  • David K. Evans

    (Center for Global Development)

  • Susannah Hares

    (Center for Global Development)

Abstract

Students around the world lack foundational literacy and numeracy (FLN) skills at striking rates. This essay examines the potential channels by which FLN investments and skills—which most systems teach in the early grades of primary school—may impact later schooling and subsequent life outcomes and the existing evidence for each channel. We find suggestive evidence for widening trajectories in school between students who master FLN skills in early grades and those who do not, although other factors may also explain the widening gaps. We find mixed evidence on the returns to FLN skills in earnings and other adult outcomes. We discuss new evidence from high-income countries suggesting that investments in pre-primary and early primary may not actually deliver the highest returns, and new evidence from low- and middle-income countries situating FLN investments among investments in other skills. We also discuss political obstacles to FLN investments. FLN skills are clearly essential for a growing, equitable society, but the distribution of investments in these and other skills—and the timing of those investments, in early primary or later in the course of an individual’s education—requires clear-eyed thinking about the relative returns of these investments and the challenges in their implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • David K. Evans & Susannah Hares, 2021. "Should Governments and Donors Prioritize Investments in Foundational Literacy and Numeracy?," Working Papers 579, Center for Global Development.
  • Handle: RePEc:cgd:wpaper:579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cgdev.org/publication/should-governments-and-donors-prioritize-investments-foundational-literacy-and-numeracy?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cgd:wpaper:579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publications Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cgdevus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.