IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_12236.html

How New Business Models Shape Innovation Spillovers: Insights from the New Space Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Lars Hornuf
  • Daniel Vrankar

Abstract

Those seeking to drum up public support for the space industry frequently cite its potential to generate valuable spillovers to other industries. However, existing research on spillover effects overlooks differences in business models among commercial actors and focuses only on individual projects or specific space agencies. We analyze how evolving business models influence spillovers by comparing the dynamic capabilities of traditional aerospace conglomerates to those of new space firms, using a unique dataset of 35,696 space-related patent applications. We find that, in addition to industries directly related to space, such as aeronautics, sectors like manufacturing and communication technology in particular benefit from space activities. At the firm level, we observe that new space business models present greater spillover potential and generate more spillovers than traditional aerospace conglomerates. However, traditional conglomerates such as Airbus or Boeing induce spillovers into digital systems and clean tech, while new space firms cannot translate their digital business models into digital spillovers and occupy more peripheral positions in the innovation network of space. Additionally, based on two different innovation metrics and more than 1.6 million additional patent applications, we find no evidence that the business models of the space industry have generally led to more spillovers than other high-tech industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Lars Hornuf & Daniel Vrankar, 2025. "How New Business Models Shape Innovation Spillovers: Insights from the New Space Economy," CESifo Working Paper Series 12236, CESifo.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp12236.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mariana Mazzucato, 2018. "Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(5), pages 803-815.
    2. Ferreira, João J.M. & Fernandes, Cristina I. & Veiga, Pedro Mota, 2024. "The effects of knowledge spillovers, digital capabilities, and innovation on firm performance: A moderated mediation model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    3. Monika Schnitzer & Martin Watzinger, 2022. "Measuring the Spillovers of Venture Capital," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 104(2), pages 276-292, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janssen, Matthijs J. & Abbasiharofteh, Milad, 2022. "Boundary spanning R&D collaboration: Key enabling technologies and missions as alleviators of proximity effects?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    2. repec:bcp:journl:v:5:y:2021:i:09:p:679-686 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Alje van Dam & Koen Frenken, 2020. "Vertical vs. Horizontal Policy in a Capabilities Model of Economic Development," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2037, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Aug 2020.
    4. Allen, Darcy W.E. & Berg, Chris & Markey-Towler, Brendan & Novak, Mikayla & Potts, Jason, 2020. "Blockchain and the evolution of institutional technologies: Implications for innovation policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    5. Elstner, Steffen & Grimme, Christian & Kecht, Valentin & Lehmann, Robert, 2022. "The diffusion of technological progress in ICT," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    6. Serenella Caravella & Francesco Crespi & Giacomo Cucignatto & Dario Guarascio, 2023. "Technological Sovereignty and Strategic Dependencies: The case of the Photovoltaic Supply Chain," CIMEO Working Paper Series 173, Centre for Investigation and Modelling of Experimental Observations (CIMEO).
    7. Suarsana, Laura & Schneider, Tina & Warsewa, Günter, 2023. "Do regional innovation strategies meet societal challenges? A comparative analysis across regions in Belgium, Germany, Netherlands and Finland," Schriftenreihe Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft 40/2023, Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft (IAW), Universität Bremen und Arbeitnehmerkammer Bremen.
    8. Gasperin, Simone, 2022. "Lessons from the past for 21st century systems of state-owned enterprises: The case of Italy's IRI in the 1930s," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 599-612.
    9. Francesco Molica, 2025. "Reassessing Cohesion Policy Through the Lens of the New EU Industrial Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(1), pages 302-319, January.
    10. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Wang, Chih-Wei & Liu, Fengyun, 2024. "Does green credit promote the performance of new energy companies and how? The role of R&D investment and financial development," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    11. Md Saifur Rahman & Md Faisal Abedin Khan & Lukas Giessen, 2024. "Analysing policy changes for achieving sustainable development goals: Insights from forest, environment and climate change action plan in Bangladesh," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 48(2), pages 508-524, May.
    12. Llopis, Oscar & D'Este, Pablo & McKelvey, Maureen & Yegros, Alfredo, 2022. "Navigating multiple logics: Legitimacy and the quest for societal impact in science," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    13. Andrea Coveri & Claudio Cozza & Dario Guarascio, 2025. "Blurring Boundaries: An Analysis of the Digital Platforms-Military Nexus," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 1632-1663, August.
    14. Malte Jütting, 2020. "Exploring Mission-Oriented Innovation Ecosystems for Sustainability: Towards a Literature-Based Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-28, August.
    15. Paola Perez-Aleman & Tommaso Ferretti, 2023. "Creating innovation capabilities for improving global health: Inventing technology for neglected tropical diseases in Brazil," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 84-114, March.
    16. Lilia Stubrin & Anabel Marin & Diego Murguía, 2024. "Innovation opportunities and backward linkages in mining: an analysis of Argentinean knowledge-intensive mining suppliers (KIMS)," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 33(4), pages 965-985.
    17. Emmanuelle Reuter & Florian Überbacher, 2025. "Coping With Procedural Uncertainty: Firms' Procedural Framings and Political Strategies in the Context of Switzerland's Mission‐Driven Energy Policy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 2511-2528, February.
    18. Garcia-Macia, Daniel & Korosteleva, Julia, 2025. "Tracing productivity growth channels in the UK," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    19. Tea Petrin & Dragana Radicic, 2023. "Instrument policy mix and firm size: is there complementarity between R&D subsidies and R&D tax credits?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 181-215, February.
    20. Thomas SJ Smith, 2023. "Mapping complexity in deglobalisation: A typology of economic localisms from ‘hyper-localism’ to ‘strategic autonomy’," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 38(3), pages 242-263, May.
    21. Sanghamitra Chakravarty & Georgina Mercedes Gómez, 2024. "A Development Lens to Frugal Innovation: Bringing Back Production and Technological Capabilities into the Discourse," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(1), pages 82-101, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D62 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Externalities
    • H57 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Procurement
    • L20 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - General
    • L21 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Business Objectives of the Firm

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.