IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cep/stitep/267.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Incomplete Written Contracts: Endogenous Agency Problems (Revised version, 'Describability and Agency Problems', published in European Economic Review, vol.42 (1998), pp.35-59.)

Author

Listed:
  • Luca Anderlini
  • Leonardo Felli

Abstract

This paper suggests a reason, other than asymmetric formation, why agency contracts are not explicitly contingent on the contracting parties' performances or actions. This reason is the formal nature of contracts: the form, usually written, that contracts are required to take to be enforceable in a court of law by legal prescription, common practice or simply by the contracting parties' will. We model the formal nature of contracts as the requirement that the mapping from the domain of the contract into the corresponding remunerations must be of an algorithmic nature. We show that there exist situations in which the chosen contract cannot be explicitly contingent on the parties' performance although, in principle, such performances are contractible and observable to all parties to the contract, court included. This approach allows us to interpret agency contracts as incomplete contracts. We relate this incompleteness either to the form of the parties' preferences or to the shape of the technological relationship through which the parties' contractible performances are transformed into contractible outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Luca Anderlini & Leonardo Felli, 1993. "Incomplete Written Contracts: Endogenous Agency Problems (Revised version, 'Describability and Agency Problems', published in European Economic Review, vol.42 (1998), pp.35-59.)," STICERD - Theoretical Economics Paper Series 267, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
  • Handle: RePEc:cep:stitep:267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cep:stitep:267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/_new/publications/default.asp .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.