IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cep/cepcnp/489.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Four principles for the UK's Brexit trade negotiations

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Sampson

Abstract

The first priority in the UK government's plans for Brexit trade negotiations should be to agree a transitional deal to cover its relations with the European Union (EU) until a long-term agreement is reached. What's more, triggering Article 50 by March 2017 would be a mistake and should be avoided. These are among the conclusions of a research report by Thomas Sampson, which sets out four principles that should guide the UK's approach to future negotiations, most immediately with the European Union. He explains that to achieve its post-Brexit objectives, whatever they turn out to be, the UK government needs a trade negotiating strategy based on a clear-eyed understanding of how trade agreements work. Trade negotiations are not a cooperative endeavour; rather, they are a bargain between countries with competing objectives. And in the case of UK-EU negotiations, the UK has a weak hand because it needs a deal more than the EU does.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Sampson, 2016. "Four principles for the UK's Brexit trade negotiations," CentrePiece - The magazine for economic performance 489, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    • Handle: RePEc:cep:cepcnp:489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/cp489.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrei HREBENCIUC, 2017. "The costs of Brexit for UK economy," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(2(611), S), pages 319-327, Summer.
    2. Swati Dhingra & Gianmarco Ottaviano & Thomas Sampson, 2017. "A hitch-hiker’s guide to post-Brexit trade negotiations: options and principles," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(suppl_1), pages 22-30.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Brexit; trade; UK economy; UK politics;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cep:cepcnp:489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/_new/publications/centrepiece/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.