IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

El libre albedrío y los conceptos de racionalidad y de elección racional en la ciencia económica

Listed author(s):
  • Luisa Montuschi

The assumption of rationality is one of the most important as well most controversial assumptions of economic science and of the theory of rational choice. But there are many difficulties associated with the concept of economic rationality, or the classical model of rationality, which is usually understood as the principle according to which people act rationally in the sense that they tend to adopt the best means which they suppose are oriented toward the satisfaction of their unquestioned goals. To understand properly the scope of such concept it is important to analyze the meaning of rationality and to distinguish between theoretical rationality and practical rationality and to consider the problem or free will and determinism as well. To understand how people make decisions that depart from the optimal model different notions of rationality are presented: instrumental rationality, substantive rationality and procedural rationality among others.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Universidad del CEMA in its series CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. with number 324.

in new window

Length: 33 pages
Date of creation: Jul 2006
Handle: RePEc:cem:doctra:324
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Av. Córdoba 374, (C1054AAP) Capital Federal

Phone: (5411) 6314-3000
Fax: (5411) 4314-1654
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cem:doctra:324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Valeria Dowding)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.