IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt37s8b56q.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Making Bicycling Equitable: Lessons from Sociocultural Research

Author

Listed:
  • McCullough, Sarah R
  • Lugo, Adonia
  • Stokkum, Rebecca van

Abstract

This white paper provides guidance for how planning, policy, and advocacy may better account for complex sociocultural forces, including gender, class, and race. The authors reviewed a large body of sociocultural research on bicycling with complex models capable of addressing an intersectional understanding of identity, the innerworkings of power in society, and the nature of inequity. These findings coalesced into four recommendations for those promoting bicycling as a mode of everyday transportation: (1) Extend what it means to embrace difference; (2) Recognize that the streets are not equally safe for all; (3) Engage in a meaningful way with marginalized communities and share decision-making power; and (4) Understand how local and national histories of injustice influence and relate to current bicycling planning processes. Integrating these recommendations into advocacy, policy, and planning can lead to greater equity in representation, distribution of resources, and decision-making in promoting bicycling. System-wide implementation of these recommendations will create the greatest impact on improving issues of equity, diversity, and inclusion in bicycling. This requires broad-scale interventions, including but not limited to, training, changes to funding and decision-making structures, valuing long-term community engagement and community knowledge, broadening measures to street safety, and considering historic inequality.

Suggested Citation

  • McCullough, Sarah R & Lugo, Adonia & Stokkum, Rebecca van, 2019. "Making Bicycling Equitable: Lessons from Sociocultural Research," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt37s8b56q, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt37s8b56q
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/37s8b56q.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Popan, Cosmin & Anaya-Boig, Esther, 2021. "The intersectional precarity of platform cycle delivery workers," SocArXiv tk6v8, Center for Open Science.
    2. Aryana Soliz, 2021. "Creating Sustainable Cities through Cycling Infrastructure? Learning from Insurgent Mobilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Adam, Matthieu & Sayagh, David & Buhler, Thomas, 2024. "Preaching to the converted? Socially unequal reception of a bike repair subsidy in France," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 31-39.
    4. Elliott, Lucas D. & McLeod, Ken & Bopp, Melissa, 2022. "U.S. complete streets initiatives are lacking explicit language surrounding various demographic populations: A call to action," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 40-43.
    5. Barajas, Jesus, 2021. "Biking Where Black: Connecting Transportation Planning and Infrastructure to Disproportionate Policing," SocArXiv wszgv, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt37s8b56q. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.