IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/indrel/qt2x39c3kp.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Local Ladder Effect: Social Status and Subjective Well-Being

Author

Listed:
  • Anderson, Cameron
  • Kraus, Michael W.
  • Keltner, Dacher

Abstract

Dozens of studies in different nations reveal that socioeconomic status only weakly predicts an individual’s subjective well-being (SWB). These effects suggest that although the pursuit of social status is a fundamental human motivation, achieving high status has little impact on one’s SWB. However, we propose that sociometric status – the respect and admiration one has in face-to-face groups (e.g., one’s friendship group or workplace) – has a stronger effect on SWB than does socioeconomic status. Using correlational, experimental, and longitudinal methodologies, four studies found consistent evidence for a “Local Ladder Effect”: sociometric status significantly predicted satisfaction with life and the experience of positive and negative emotions. Longitudinally, as sociometric status rises or falls, SWB rises or falls accordingly. Furthermore, these effects were driven by feelings of power and social acceptance. Overall, individuals’ sociometric status – their respect and admiration in local, face-to-face groups –matters more than their socioeconomic status for SWB.

Suggested Citation

  • Anderson, Cameron & Kraus, Michael W. & Keltner, Dacher, 2011. "The Local Ladder Effect: Social Status and Subjective Well-Being," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt2x39c3kp, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:indrel:qt2x39c3kp
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/2x39c3kp.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Business;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:indrel:qt2x39c3kp. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/irucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.