IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/ctcres/qt3r1334mz.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Tobacco Industry Attempts to Subvert European Union Tobacco Advertising Legislation

Author

Listed:
  • Bitton, Asaf
  • Neuman, Mark D.
  • Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D.

Abstract

Beginning with the Europe Against Cancer Action Program in 1985, the European Economic Community (EEC), which was later renamed the European Community (EC) with its incorporation into the new European Union (EU) in 1992, began to seriously consider tobacco product regulation to fight tobacco-related illness on a pan-European scale. A key element of the EC’s policy was a directive intended initially to restrict, and later to end, tobacco advertising and sponsorship in the Community. The Directive was introduced by the European Commission in 1989, and was adopted nine years later, in 1998. In 2001, the directive was annulled following litigation brought by the Republic of Germany in the European Court of Justice (ECJ). Previously secret tobacco industry documents indicate that the tobacco industry lobbied politicians and used third party organizations in an organized attempt to weaken or defeat the Advertising Directive. The tobacco industry efforts involved figures at the highest levels of European politics, including former German Chancellor Helmut Kohl, former British Secretary of State Kenneth Clarke, and former European Commissioner Martin Bangemann. A large degree of the industry’s effort to influence EC policy focused on lobbying government officials and industrial groups within a number of key EC member states, including Germany, the UK, the Netherlands, and Denmark. The tobacco industry viewed Germany as a strong and consistent ally of the tobacco industry in its attempts to defeat the Advertising Directive within the EC and through litigation at the level of the European Court of Justice. The tobacco industry engaged in a number of practices to conceal its role, particularly the formulation and introduction of an industry-authored minimum harmonization proposal intended to replace the EC Draft Directive without disclosing the industry’s role in preparing the draft.. The documents suggest the involvement of Martin Bangemann and the German delegation to the European Commission in introducing the tobacco industry’s proposal without disclosing its source. The fight for an effective pan-European advertising ban continued with the EC Draft Directive on Advertising and Sponsorship proposed in Spring 2001. The new draft seeks to eliminate provisions that rendered the earlier Advertising Directive inconsistent with EC jurisdiction. A thorough knowledge of previous industry tactics and strategies can help advocates of strong EC public health legislation overcome obstacles that have so far hindered the implementation of an effective EC Tobacco Advertising Directive.

Suggested Citation

  • Bitton, Asaf & Neuman, Mark D. & Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., 2002. "Tobacco Industry Attempts to Subvert European Union Tobacco Advertising Legislation," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt3r1334mz, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:ctcres:qt3r1334mz
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/3r1334mz.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anderson, Stacey J. & Pollay, Richard W. & Ling, Pamela M., 2006. "Taking ad-Vantage of lax advertising regulation in the USA and Canada: Reassuring and distracting health-concerned smokers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(8), pages 1973-1985, October.
    2. Weishaar, Heide & Amos, Amanda & Collin, Jeff, 2015. "Best of enemies: Using social network analysis to explore a policy network in European smoke-free policy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 85-92.
    3. Borja García & Henk Erik Meier, 2017. "Global Sport Power Europe? The Efficacy of the European Union in Global Sport Regulation," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 850-870, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:ctcres:qt3r1334mz. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://escholarship.org/uc/ctcre/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.