IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cda/wpaper/380.html

Conditional Dominance in Games with Unawareness

Author

Listed:
  • Burkhard C. Schipper

    (Department of Economics, University of California Davis)

Abstract

Heifetz, Meier, and Schipper (2013) introduced dynamic games with unawareness consisting of a partially ordered set of games in extensive form. Here, we study the normal form of dynamic games with unawareness. The generalized normal form associated with a dynamic game with unawareness consists of a partially ordered set of games in normal form. We characterize strong rationalizability (resp., prudent rationalizability) in dynamic games with unawareness by iterated conditional strict (resp., weak) dominance in the associated generalized normal form. We also show that the analogue to iterated admissibility for dynamic games with unawareness depends on the extensive form. This is because, under unawareness, a player's information set not only determines which nodes she considers possible but also which game tree(s) she is aware of.

Suggested Citation

  • Burkhard C. Schipper, 2026. "Conditional Dominance in Games with Unawareness," Working Papers 380, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:cda:wpaper:380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.dss.ucdavis.edu/files/uyvgkrfx3ibfd6g0bqnb0i2jwfqt/condom20260428.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cda:wpaper:380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Letters and Science IT Services Unit (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/educdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.