IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Assigning Grades During an Earthquake - Shaken or Stirred?

Listed author(s):
Registered author(s):

    In the event of an unanticipated disruption to normal life, universities tend to shift to an online environment in both delivery and assessment. Course instructors still need to assign grades despite not having the full set of planned assessments. This paper examines how grades are disrupted when an increased reliance is placed on online assessments. We find substantial grade disruption and grade inflation as the weighting on online assessments rises relative to invigilated assessments. Grade inflation can be moderated by scaling to an historical distribution of grades; however such scaling can lead to substantial grade disruption where the quality of the cohort is different than the historical average. We also find evidence that time limited online assessments produce lower grade disruptions as weighting on the online component increases.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance in its series Working Papers in Economics with number 11/40.

    in new window

    Length: 35 pages
    Date of creation: 25 Nov 2011
    Handle: RePEc:cbt:econwp:11/40
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand

    Phone: 64 3 369 3123 (Administrator)
    Fax: 64 3 364 2635
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbt:econwp:11/40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Albert Yee)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.