IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Alternative Approaches to Tax Risk and Tax Avoidance: analysis of a face-to-face corporate survey


  • Judith Freedman

    (University of Oxford)

  • Geoffrey Loomer

    (Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation)

  • John Vella

    (University of Oxford)


This paper analyzes the results of a survey of views of large businesses regarding recent UK Government initiatives aimed at modifying taxpayer behaviour and tackling what is perceived by the tax authorities acting on behalf of Government to be unacceptable/aggressive tax avoidance. Specifically, it examines the views of tax directors obtained from face-to-face interviews conducted in spring 2008 with representatives of 30 corporate groups regarding alternative approaches to tax risk and tax avoidance. The paper first describes the experiences and opinions of large business representatives with respect to the Risk Rating Approach, a key feature of the HMRC links with large business programme (Varney Programme), as well as the status of relationships between HMRC and large business more generally. It next considers the respondents’ views on the practical implications of two developing legislative approaches – targeted anti-avoidance rules (TAARs) and principles-based legislation (PBL) – and how these approaches impact upon and are influenced by relationships between HMRC and large businesses.

Suggested Citation

  • Judith Freedman & Geoffrey Loomer & John Vella, 2008. "Alternative Approaches to Tax Risk and Tax Avoidance: analysis of a face-to-face corporate survey," Working Papers 0814, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
  • Handle: RePEc:btx:wpaper:0814

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Simon Loretz & Padraig Moore, 2013. "Corporate tax competition between firms," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 20(5), pages 725-752, October.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:btx:wpaper:0814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dongxian Guo). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.