IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bre/polcon/32541.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The European Union-Mercosur Free Trade Agreement- Prospects and risks

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Baltensperger
  • Uri Dadush

Abstract

The quantifiable gains from the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and Mercosur – Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay – are small on account of the small share of EU trade with Mercosur and the relatively modest ambitions of the deal in terms of liberalising agriculture in the EU and manufacturing in Mercosur. Nevertheless, the agreement, if ratified and accompanied by reforms that strengthen competitiveness, could represent a major...

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Baltensperger & Uri Dadush, 2019. "The European Union-Mercosur Free Trade Agreement- Prospects and risks," Policy Contributions 32541, Bruegel.
    • Handle: RePEc:bre:polcon:32541
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/PC-11_2019.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Franz Sinabell & Julia Grübler & Oliver Reiter, 2020. "Implications of the EU-Mercosur Association Agreement for Austria - A Preliminary Assess," FIW Research Reports series VII-003, FIW.
    2. Franz Sinabell & Julia Grübler & Oliver Reiter, 2020. "Implications of the EU-Mercosur Association Agreement for Austria - A Preliminary Assess," FIW Research Reports series VII-003, FIW.
    3. Franz Sinabell & Julia Grübler & Oliver Reiter, 2020. "Implications of the EU-Mercosur Association Agreement for Austria. A Preliminary Assessment," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 66364, April.
    4. Katharine Heyl & Felix Ekardt & Paula Roos & Jessica Stubenrauch & Beatrice Garske, 2021. "Free Trade, Environment, Agriculture, and Plurilateral Treaties: The Ambivalent Example of Mercosur, CETA, and the EU–Vietnam Free Trade Agreement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bre:polcon:32541. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bruegel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bruegbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.