IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bou/wpaper/2006-16.html

Yonetisim ve Kurumlar Terimlerinin Iktisat Literaturundeki Yukselisi

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmet Faruk Aysan

Abstract

This paper investigates the rising and trendy research on institutions and governance. First, the governance and institution concepts are defined and their differences are illustrated. When one considers the existing research on the governance and institutions, the governance as a concept is mostly used in reference to the outcomes. However, the institution concept usually refers to the underlying reasons for the outcome of governance. After dwelling on the conceptual framework to categorize the governance and institutions, this paper analyzes how the existing studies on governance and institutions categorize various different forms of governance and institutions. The agency based and structural reasons for the resurgence of the governance and institutional research are also explored in this study. The studies of Daron Acemoğlu et al. are specially denoted as an agency based reasons for the recent interest in the governance and institution studies. Structural reasons, on the other hand, are associated with the recent adoption of Post Washington Consensus. Finally, in this paper, the reasons to achieve better governance and more quality institutions are classified under three broad categories as the economic, political and cultural reasons. With this conceptual framework, the research on the governance and institutions literature will be approached more analytically.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmet Faruk Aysan, 2006. "Yonetisim ve Kurumlar Terimlerinin Iktisat Literaturundeki Yukselisi," Working Papers 2006/16, Bogazici University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:bou:wpaper:2006/16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econ.boun.edu.tr/public_html/RePEc/pdf/200616.pdf
    File Function: First version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • P48 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - Legal Institutions; Property Rights; Natural Resources; Energy; Environment; Regional Studies
    • B15 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary
    • F43 - International Economics - - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance - - - Economic Growth of Open Economies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bou:wpaper:2006/16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lutfu Gozgucu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deboutr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.