IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bon/boncrc/crctr224_2021_297.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Digital Platforms and the New 19a Tool in the German Competition Act

Author

Listed:
  • Jens-Uwe Franck
  • Martin Peitz

Abstract

In this article we present and critically evaluate the newly introduced section 19a of the German Competition Act. The provision applies to operators of two-sided platforms and networks that the Bundeskartellamt classifies as being of ‘paramount significance for competition across markets’. Using examples of previous abuse cases, we discuss which firms may eventually be the addressees of the new instrument. We analyse the list of prohibitable practices and point to normative uncertainties as regards the assessment of platform activities. We discuss the merits of the abridged judicial review. Finally, we consider the prospect of continuing fragmentation in the legal treatment of digital platforms in the internal market and assess the interaction with the Digital Markets Act as proposed by the European Commission.

Suggested Citation

  • Jens-Uwe Franck & Martin Peitz, 2021. "Digital Platforms and the New 19a Tool in the German Competition Act," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2021_297, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2021_297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.crctr224.de/research/discussion-papers/archive/dp297
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Budzinski, Oliver, 2021. "Europäische Regulierung digitaler Dienste: Eine kritische Würdigung der Entwürfe DMA & DSA aus medienökonomischer Perspektive," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 158, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    2. Podszun Rupprecht, 2023. "From Competition Law to Platform Regulation – Regulatory Choices for the Digital Markets Act," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 1-13, January.
    3. Amelia Fletcher, 2023. "International pro-competition regulation of digital platforms: healthy experimentation or dangerous fragmentation?," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 39(1), pages 12-33.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    competition law; abuse of market power; digital platforms; gatekeeper; Big Tech;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K21 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Antitrust Law

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2021_297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CRC Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.crctr224.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.