IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/usug17/12.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Estimation and inference for quantiles and indices of inequality and poverty with survey data: leveraging built-in support for complex survey design and multiply imputed data

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe Van Kerm

    (Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER), Luxembourg)

Abstract

Stata is the software of choice for many analysts of household surveys, in particular for poverty and inequality analysis. No dedicated suite of command comes bundled with the software, but many user-written commands are freely available for the estimation of various types of indices. This talk will present a set of new tools which complement and significantly upgrade some existing packages. The key feature of the new packages is their ability to leverage Stata's built-in capacity for dealing with survey design features (via the svy prefix), resampling methods (via the bootstrap, jackknife or permute prefixes), multiply imputed data (via mi) and various post-estimation commands for testing purposes. The talk will review basic indices, outline estimation and inference for such non-linear statistics with survey data, show programming tips, and illustrate various uses of the new commands.

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe Van Kerm, 2017. "Estimation and inference for quantiles and indices of inequality and poverty with survey data: leveraging built-in support for complex survey design and multiply imputed data," United Kingdom Stata Users' Group Meetings 2017 12, Stata Users Group.
  • Handle: RePEc:boc:usug17:12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.org/usug2017/vankerm-uksug17.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Doorley, Karina & Privalko, Ivan & Russell, Helen & Tuda, Dora, 2021. "The Gender Pay Gap in Ireland from Austerity through Recovery," IZA Discussion Papers 14441, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:usug17:12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stataea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.