Tobin's Q And Financial Policy Revisited
Research by Chirinko (1982,1985,1987) makes a convincing argument that Q theory is unlikely to provide a satisfactory investment model. However, Klock Thies, and Baum (1991) show that Q is commonly mismeasured. The finding is applicable to Chirinko’s empirical research and raises the question of weather the failure of empirical Q models is the result of measurement errors. Utilizing disaggregated data with more accurately measured Qs, we test Chirinko's model. The results are improved and eliminate some of the anomalies Chirinko obtained. Since better Q data improves the performance of empirical Q models, the dismissal of Q theory may be premature.
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||Dec 1993|
|Date of revision:|
|Publication status:||Published, revised as "Tobin's Q, Intangible Capital and Financial Policy", Journal of Economics and Business, 48, 387-400, 1996.|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill MA 02467 USA|
Web page: http://fmwww.bc.edu/EC/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:bocoec:226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.