IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bjn/evalua/e1popintuitions.html

Evaluation 1 of "Population ethical intuitions"

Author

Listed:
  • Stijn Bruers

Abstract

Highly policy relevant, original research with clear hypothesis tests and valid statistical analyses.Biases and framing effects are mitigated but remain difficult to avoid in such surveys. Some results (e.g. the negative utilitarian judgments and a lack of asymmetry) seem to be contradictory. One possible explanation for an apparent contradictory result is not addressed.

Suggested Citation

  • Stijn Bruers, 2025. "Evaluation 1 of "Population ethical intuitions"," The Unjournal Evaluations 2025-37, The Unjournal.
    • Handle: RePEc:bjn:evalua:e1popintuitions
    DOI: 10.21428/d28e8e57.a3bb8738/ca41cb37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://unjournal.pubpub.org/pub/e1popintuitions
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.21428/d28e8e57.a3bb8738/ca41cb37?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gustafsson, Johan E., 2020. "Population axiology and the possibility of a fourth category of absolute value – CORRIGENDUM," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(1), pages 111-111, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gustafsson, Johan E. & Spears, Dean & Zuber, Stéphane, 2023. "Utilitarianism Is Implied by Social and Individual Dominance," IZA Discussion Papers 16561, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Christian Tarsney & Harvey Lederman & Dean Spears, 2024. "A Dominance Argument Against Incompleteness," Papers 2403.17641, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjn:evalua:e1popintuitions. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Davit Jintcharadze (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://unjournal.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.