IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bie/wpaper/769.html

First-price Sealed-bid Auctions with Smoothly Ambiguity-Averse Bidders

Author

Listed:
  • Ma, Tianyu

    (Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University)

  • Riedel, Frank

    (Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University)

Abstract

We analyze first-price sealed-bid auctions with independent private values in which bidders are uncertain about the distribution of their opponents’ valuations and have smooth ambiguity preferences. We characterize the unique non- decreasing symmetric equilibrium, whose bidding function solves a nonlinear ordinary differential equation with an endogenous ambiguity-adjusted distribution. Bids increase in ambiguity aversion, lie between the Bayesian benchmarks generated by the least and most competitive candidate priors, and converge to the maxmin benchmark. Under constant relative ambiguity aversion (CRAA), the equilibrium biding function is explicit. We also compare auction formats. Under an ex ante predictive criterion, the second-price auction dominates under ambiguity neutrality, but sufficiently strong ambiguity aversion reverses the ranking. Under a model-based criterion, the first- price auction performs better in less competitive environments and worse in more competitive ones, while compressing the range of possible revenues. Bidder preferences also depend on ambiguity attitudes: CRAA bidders weakly prefer the second-price auction, whereas bidders with increasing absolute ambiguity aversion weakly prefer the first-price auction.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma, Tianyu & Riedel, Frank, 2026. "First-price Sealed-bid Auctions with Smoothly Ambiguity-Averse Bidders," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 769, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  • Handle: RePEc:bie:wpaper:769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/3019070/3019071
    File Function: First Version, 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bie:wpaper:769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bettina Weingarten (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imbiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.