IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bie/wpaper/735.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A hypothesis test for the long-term calibration in rating systems with overlapping time windows

Author

Listed:
  • Kurth, Patrick

    (Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University)

  • Nendel, Max

    (Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University)

  • Streicher, Jan

    (Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University)

Abstract

We present a statistical test that can be used to verify supervisory re- quirements concerning overlapping time windows for the long-term calibration in rating systems. In a first step, we show that the long-run default rate is approximately normally distributed with respect to random effects in default realization. We then perform a detailed analysis of the correlation effects caused by the overlapping time windows and solve the problem of an unknown distribution of default probabilities for the long-run default rate. In this context, we present several methods for a conservative calibration test that can deal with the unknown variance in the test statistic. We present a test for individual rating grades, and then pass to the portfolio level by suitably adapting the test statistic. We conclude with comparative statics analysing the effect of persisting customers and the number of customers per reference date.

Suggested Citation

  • Kurth, Patrick & Nendel, Max & Streicher, Jan, 2025. "A hypothesis test for the long-term calibration in rating systems with overlapping time windows," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 735, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  • Handle: RePEc:bie:wpaper:735
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/3006162/3006163
    File Function: First Version, 2023
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bie:wpaper:735. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bettina Weingarten (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imbiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.