IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bge/wpaper/1540.html

Optimal Investment-Based Crowdfunding: Crowdblessing Versus Scale

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Ellman
  • Sjaak Hurkens

Abstract

This paper examines crowdfunding of a risky project with constant returns to scale. The crowdfunder's chosen threshold and interest rate jointly determine profit and welfare via information aggregation and investors' information acquisition and bidding decisions. At fixed investor strategies, a higher threshold funds fewer projects but raises the ratio of good to bad quality among those funded – a "crowdblessing" or positive selection lacking in standard finance. This also reduces incentives to acquire and use private information, as do interest rate increases. Optimal design trades off the scale of investment against the level of crowdblessing. Surprisingly, profit-maximizers induce excessive information acquisition to limit investor rent. Comparative statics show that information acquisition falls with its cost, rises with its precision and falls with prior optimism. Costs reduce welfare but may raise profits by facilitating rent-extraction.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Ellman & Sjaak Hurkens, 2025. "Optimal Investment-Based Crowdfunding: Crowdblessing Versus Scale," Working Papers 1540, Barcelona School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:bge:wpaper:1540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://bw.bse.eu/wp-content/uploads/1540.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • L12 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Monopoly; Monopolization Strategies

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bge:wpaper:1540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bruno Guallar (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bargses.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.