IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bep/itfapp/1137.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Patterns of Discrimination in the Romanian Labor Market: The Impact of Gradual Exposure to Various Labor Markets within the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Mihaela Dobre

    (Lecturer Ph.D., Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Dorel Ailenei

    (Professor Ph.D., Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Coralia Angelescu

    (Professor Ph.D., Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Discrimination under its various manifestations will always represent a contemporary current issue. Discrimination's expressions emerge when a group of individuals sharing common characteristics (such as religious convictions, certain race or gender, etc) is discriminated regardless their own labor productivity. The empirical data demonstrated that differences in productivity are not entirely explained by the income differences between men and women. G. Becker (1971) was the founder of the modern economic theory of discrimination, which was developed later by Arrow (1973). The two researchers considered that people tend to have different behaviors pattern related to the people they work with, to supervisors and buyers and ultimately they claim compensation in order to work with the members of such a discriminated group. The main focus in the specialized literature was to understand how authority is distributed in accordance with sex, religion, race, ethnic group, age, etc (H.L.Moore-1988). Discrimination may be generated both by employer and employee when the latter refuse to work with a certain group or claim for a supplementary compensation in order to work with it. In Romania, discrimination is still widely spread mainly in rural areas. The occupational ratio for men was 64,6% compared to 53% for women according to data provided by EUROSTAT in 2006. The equality of chances between men and women persist on fairly low levels according to the "The Global Gender Gap Report 2006" issued by World Economic, Forum in 2006. Romania is ranked 46 among a list of 115 countries, having the same score as Ukraine, Uganda and Trinidad-Tobago. Romania is well ranked in the field of education and health areas. In spite of this, Romania registers a low level in case of representation of women at political level, in terms of salary policy, as the authors emphasize that the ratio between woman's salary and man's salary represents 0.64. As stated by the euro barometer of European Commission published in July 2006, the most common forms of discrimination are: ethnic discrimination (64%), disability discrimination (53%), sexual orientation discrimination (50%), age discrimination (46%), religion discrimination (44%), gender discrimination (40%). In terms of worker's gender discrimination Italy and Spain recorded the highest level: 56% in case of Italy and 51% in case of Spain. Romania also registered a high level of discrimination of approximately 32%. Disparities between men's wages and women's wages are determined by level of qualifications and hierarchical position at work place. Statistical data published by EUROSTAT for 2007 showed that women's average income is 13% lower than men's as worked performed is similar to men's. The current paper has as main objective to study the structural changes in Romania, which have influenced the salary differences between men and women on the labor market. Key words: discrimination, labor market, asymmetric information, and occupation rate.JEL: J01, J15, 16This paper was presented on May 23, 2008, at the 18th International Conference of the International Trade and Finance Association, meeting at Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihaela Dobre & Dorel Ailenei & Coralia Angelescu, 2008. "Patterns of Discrimination in the Romanian Labor Market: The Impact of Gradual Exposure to Various Labor Markets within the European Union," International Trade and Finance Association Conference Papers 1137, International Trade and Finance Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:bep:itfapp:1137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    discrimination; labor market; asymmetric information; and occupation rate.jel: j01; j15; 16this paper was presented on may 23; 2008; at the 18th international conference of the international trade and finance association; meeting at universidade nova de lisboa; lisbon; portugal.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General
    • J15 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Minorities, Races, Indigenous Peoples, and Immigrants; Non-labor Discrimination

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bep:itfapp:1137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itfaeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.