IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bcc/wpaper/2012-09.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluating Governance and Participatory Processes in Natura 2000: Lessons Learned and Guidance for Future Prospects

Author

Listed:
  • María-Angeles Díez
  • Iker Etxano
  • Eneko Garmendia

Abstract

In recent years, participatory approaches have been incorporated in decision-making processes as a way to strengthen the bonds between diverse areas of knowledge and social actors in natural resources management and environmental governance. Despite the favourable context, this paradigm shift is still in an early stage within the development of the Natura 2000 in the European Union, the largest network of protected areas in the world. To enhance the full scope of participatory approaches in this context, this article: (i) briefly reviews the role of participatory approaches in environmental governance, (ii) develops a common framework to evaluate such participatory processes in protected area management, (iii) applies this framework to a real case study, and (iv) based on the lessons learned, provides guidance to improve the future governance of Natura 2000 sites.

Suggested Citation

  • María-Angeles Díez & Iker Etxano & Eneko Garmendia, "undated". "Evaluating Governance and Participatory Processes in Natura 2000: Lessons Learned and Guidance for Future Prospects," Working Papers 2012-09, BC3.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcc:wpaper:2012-09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.bc3research.org/index.php?option=com_wpapers&task=downpubli&iddoc=53&repec=1&Itemid=279
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental governance; evaluation; participatory process; Natura 2000; Europe;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcc:wpaper:2012-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sergio Henrique Faria). General contact details of provider: https://www.bc3research.org/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.