IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2025_296.html

How companies are using buildings to do good: a study of New Zealand property trusts

Author

Listed:
  • Shehani Gamage
  • Abdul-Rasheed Amidu
  • Deborah Levy

Abstract

With a growing emphasis on sustainability and corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the property sector, managers are increasingly challenged by the integration of financial performance with social impact. This study employs interviews with managers from listed property trusts in New Zealand to investigate their strategies for embedding social value into commercial property initiatives. The findings reveal that managers acknowledge the advantages of socially responsible practices such as heightened tenant satisfaction, improved community relations, and financial benefits, including enhanced marketability and reduced vacancy rates. The thematic analysis identifies essential strategies, including community engagement, sustainable building practices, and transparency in CSR reporting. Interviews also revealed the complexities involved in balancing the interests of various stakeholders, such as tenants, investors, and the broader community. Managers stress the importance of aligning properties with societal needs to cultivate long-term loyalty and trust, thereby enhancing reputational capital. This study contributes to the understanding of how social value is operationalised within New Zealand's listed property trust sector, offering recommendations for enhancing social value initiatives. These insights aim to inform stakeholders about the critical role of social value in fostering sustainable property management.

Suggested Citation

  • Shehani Gamage & Abdul-Rasheed Amidu & Deborah Levy, 2025. "How companies are using buildings to do good: a study of New Zealand property trusts," ERES eres2025_296, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2025_296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2025-296
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2025_296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.