IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2025_262.html

Expert opinion vs. artificial intelligence: new evidence on building age estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Matthias Soot
  • Daniel Kretzschmar
  • Alexandra Weitkamp

Abstract

The year of construction is one of the most important building features, indicating factors such as building morphology, building material types and construction technologies. Knowing the specific year of construction of a building helps to estimate energy consumption and demolition waste, answers questions about urban renewal processes in the context of urban planning, improves the accuracy of material stock models and material cadasters and advances MFA and LCA. Additionally, the building age is relevant for real estate value and rent estimations. In Germany, detailed information for individual buildings is not publicly available due to data protection regulations. Traditionally, this information is collected by experts who roughly classify buildings into an age category based on specific visual building characteristics. In recent years, the possibilities of extracting construction age information from the visual appearance of building façades via ground image data have been increasingly explored via deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN). An easy way to derive Information about images are pretrained Visual Language Models (VLM) and Large Language Models (LLM). The question arises as to whether the laborious estimation of the age of a building by humans still guarantees better results in times of freely accessible LLMs, or whether AI can beat the experts. In our study, we conducted a comprehensive survey of more than 350 real estate experts, each of whom was asked to evaluate five randomized images. Analogously, we asked the AI to do the same by using image recognition to ask ChatGPT to estimate the age of construction. The results show that the AI achieves significantly better results than individual experts across all building age groups. Only by sorting the experts according to their experience, local expertise and their own expertise assessment, and by combining the experts' estimations, certain groups of experts manage to beat the AI.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthias Soot & Daniel Kretzschmar & Alexandra Weitkamp, 2025. "Expert opinion vs. artificial intelligence: new evidence on building age estimation," ERES eres2025_262, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2025_262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2025-262
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2025_262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.