IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2025_211.html

Importance of Stakeholders and Key Performance Indicators in Campus Management: Evidence from Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Magorzata Rymarzak

Abstract

Campus managers need to balance the competing claims of different stakeholders of higher education institutions (HEIs). Previous studies in general management have indicated that the decision-making process is highly related to stakeholders’ attributes (power, legitimacy and urgency). However, such studies have not yet been conducted in the field of campus management. Therefore, this paper aims to identify the importance of key stakeholders and relevant key performance indicators (KPIs) that can be considered in campus management to support their goals. To explore the underlying importance of campus stakeholders, a theory on stakeholder silence and a questionnaire survey among Polish public HEIs were employed. In turn, to identify various KPIs, the content analysis of institutions’ strategies was conducted. Empirical research suggests that in Polish public HEIs, authorities and academic staff continue to be regarded as the most important stakeholders. This contrasts with the growing market-oriented approach seen in higher education globally. Moreover, the KPIs presented in HEIs' strategies are predominantly result-oriented and rarely user-centric (which have begun to be perceived as the most significant with respect to building performance).

Suggested Citation

  • Magorzata Rymarzak, 2025. "Importance of Stakeholders and Key Performance Indicators in Campus Management: Evidence from Poland," ERES eres2025_211, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2025_211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2025-211
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://architexturez.net/system/files/eres2025_211_presentation_P_20250705085325_1236.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2025_211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.