IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2025_138.html

Mandatory Disclosure and Housing Market Dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Bastien Patras

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of mandatory energy performance certification (EPC) disclosure on housing market dynamics in France. Building on a phased implementation of disclosure policies since 2006, the 2021 regulation introduced legally binding EPC visibility in advertisements alongside significant penalties for non-compliance. Using a (i) difference-in-discontinuity framework that exploits cross-border policy variations between France and Belgium and (ii) an event study design exploiting the heterogeneous effect of the regulation, the study accounts for spatial and temporal variations in policy adoption and identifies the causal effects of this policy on property prices. The analysis reveals three key insights. First, energy-inefficient properties (EPC ratings F or G) faced price declines up to -9 percentage points (pp) under mandatory disclosure, signaling a market penalty for inefficiency. Second, efficient properties experienced modest price gains, with houses showing a +3pp increase. Third, the regulation surprisingly fostered strategic nondisclosure, particularly in apartment market, where missing EPC ratings garnered a +14pp price premium four years after enactment. These findings highlight the heterogeneity of market responses across property types and locations. The study concludes by discussing the social welfare implications of mandatory disclosure, including improved affordability for certain buyers, risks of eviction due to price increases, and potential misreporting behaviors. By advancing the understanding of energy efficiency’s role in housing markets, this research offers actionable insights for policymakers seeking to balance climate goals with equitable market outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Bastien Patras, 2025. "Mandatory Disclosure and Housing Market Dynamics," ERES eres2025_138, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2025_138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2025-138
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2025_138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.