IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2025_117.html

Integrating Public Spaces in Private Developments: Lessons from POPSs in Transforming Mandated Spaces to Social Places

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Mohammadi
  • Erwin Heurkens

Abstract

The increasing complexity of urban spaces has blurred traditional boundaries between public and private realms, creating both opportunities and challenges for real estate developers and managers, as well as other urban stakeholders. While urban policies often mandate private developments to incorporate public spaces (amenities) like ground floor plazas, setbacks, and frontcourts, these spaces frequently face criticism for being exclusionary or underutilized. However, their potential remains largely unexploited, presenting an opportunity to reimagine how they can meaningfully serve both private interests and the public good. Rather than viewing these spaces as regulatory burdens, they can be strategically activated to enhance urban vitality, social inclusion and real estate value. They offer place-specific amenities and features that fully public spaces like streets and parks do not offer as social spaces. This research examines how the interplay between privatization of public spaces and publicization of private spaces can create opportunities for mutual benefit, using Privately Owned Public Spaces (POPSs) as a lens to understand how thoughtfully managed hybrid spaces can foster inclusive environments that benefit both private owners and public users. Through an evidence-based analysis of diverse building-space typologies across Australia and the Netherlands, focusing on POPSs, this study examines how different design and management approaches can transform mandatory (policy-made) public spaces into socially vibrant places. The research reveals that developments with more mixed and blurred boundaries between private and public realms achieve higher activity diversity and social interaction, demonstrating how sustainable integration can ensure both public and private benefits and also create more inclusive urban environments. The adaptability of these spaces during the COVID-19 pandemic has further demonstrated their potential to enhance urban resilience while serving evolving city needs. This research contributes practical insights for real estate managers and developers, as well as urban planners and policymakers, offering strategies to transform mandatory public space requirements into opportunities for social innovation. These findings are particularly relevant as cities deal with densification and the increasing need for quality, accessible public spaces within private developments while seeking to meet broader sustainability goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Mohammadi & Erwin Heurkens, 2025. "Integrating Public Spaces in Private Developments: Lessons from POPSs in Transforming Mandated Spaces to Social Places," ERES eres2025_117, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2025_117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2025-117
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2025_117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.