Author
Abstract
Among the three appraisal methods, the sales comparison approach is based on the principle of marketability. It determines the value of the subject property by comparing and adjusting its value-forming factors, circumstances, and the timing of the subject property with reference to comparable properties that are identical or similar to the subject property. The sales comparison approach is commonly used in Korea, as well as in other countries, for the valuation of residential properties. Since the sales comparison approach relies upon examples of previous sales transactions, it is compelling as an empirical appraisal method, but there is the disadvantage of the possibility of evaluator subjectivity in the selection of examples and factor comparison. Furthermore, this can lead to the possibility of price distortion resulting from agreements between the relevant parties, but currently there are no objective standards to control this. The purpose of this study is to measure the effects of the selection methods on the property valuations. Since the valuation amount may differ depending on the selected comparison examples, there is a need to research on selecting examples based on analysis of previous sales transactions. In this study, previous apartment evaluations will be used as a precedent to analyze differences in the property valuations of comparable examples according to the respective selection methods, and their intent by the parties involved. Previous apartment appraisals from Seoul, Korea in 2022 will be used to examine this. This report will demonstrate various methods to consider similarity when selecting comparison examples, such as floor area, distance from the subject property, transaction date and unit size, and propose the possible implications for the appraisal system in Korea.
Suggested Citation
Hyeyeon Ho & Jun Hyung Kim, 2023.
"Selecting Comparison Examples and its Effects on Appraisal,"
ERES
eres2023_207, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
Handle:
RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2023_207
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2023_207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.