IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2023_184.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A comprehensive literature review on the decision criteria for adaptive reuse throughout the AR process

Author

Listed:
  • Brian van Laar
  • Vincent Gruis
  • Hilde Remoy
  • Greco Angela

Abstract

The average lifetime of a building is only 39 years, with the most common reason for building demolition being functional obsolescence. At the same time buildings worldwide account for 40 percent of the world’s waste, 40 percent of material resource use and 33 percent of all human induced emissions. To cope with these environmental impacts and to extend the functional lifetime of buildings, adaptive reuse has become a well-established strategy in the field of architecture and the built environment. The decision-making process in adaptive reuse projects is often complex, due to the many stakeholders, and decision criteria involved. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) models have become increasingly popular in recent years for the evaluation of adaptive reuse projects, as they provide a structured approach to assess and compare alternative solutions, taking into account these multiple criteria. There is however no clear consensus on the decision criteria and the decision support tool when it comes to adaptive reuse. Many publications on decision making in adaptive reuse have focussed on specific areas of application within the AR process, but few have considered the full process as a whole. The lack of consensus on the decision criteria used for adaptive reuse, and the need to holistically approach the AR process as a whole, based on the different phases, provides a knowledge gap for this paper. An integrative literature review on the decision criteria for adaptive reuse was conducted using a systematic search approach. An comparative analysis was performed to find relationships and contrasts between decision criteria for adaptive reuse. Based on this analysis multiple lists of decision criteria for adaptive reuse were constructed, for the four main phases of the AR process (Pre-project, preparation, implementation, and post-completion phases). The findings of this paper contribute to the growing literature on Multi Criteria Decision Making for adaptive reuse by synthesizing the decision criteria according to the four phases of the AR process. Through this literature review, a further comprehension is provided on the decision criteria for adaptive reuse throughout the AR process, that can help stakeholders of adaptive reuse projects in structuring their decision making process.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian van Laar & Vincent Gruis & Hilde Remoy & Greco Angela, 2023. "A comprehensive literature review on the decision criteria for adaptive reuse throughout the AR process," ERES eres2023_184, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2023_184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2023-184
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/system/files/P_20230715012226_5742.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Adaptive Reuse; Circular Buildings; Decision Making; real estate management;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2023_184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.