IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2023_120.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Automated Valuation Models: Improving Model Performance by Choosing the Optimal Spatial Training Level

Author

Listed:
  • Bastian Krämer
  • Moritz Stang
  • Vanja Doskoc
  • Wolfgang Schäfers
  • Friedrich Tobias

Abstract

The use of Automated Valuation Models (AVMs) in the context of traditional real estate valuations and their performance has been discussed in the academic community for several decades. Most studies focus on finding which method is best suited for estimating property values. One aspect that has not yet been studied scientifically is the appropriate choice of the spatial training level. The published research on AVMs usually deals with a manually defined region and fails to test the methods used on different spatial levels. The aim of our research is thus to investigate the impact of training AVM algorithms at different spatial levels in terms of valuation accuracy. We use a dataset with about 1.2 million residential properties from Germany and test four different methods, namely Ordinary Least Square, Generalized Additive Models, eXtreme Gradient Boosting and Deep Neural Network. Our results show that the right choice of spatial training level can have a major impact on the model performance, and that this impact varies across the different methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Bastian Krämer & Moritz Stang & Vanja Doskoc & Wolfgang Schäfers & Friedrich Tobias, 2023. "Automated Valuation Models: Improving Model Performance by Choosing the Optimal Spatial Training Level," ERES eres2023_120, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2023_120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2023-120
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Automated Valuation Models; Machine Learning; Model Performance; Spatial Training Level;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2023_120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.