IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2023_112.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Active Trading Strategy Performance: An Empirical Comparison using US REIT Data

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Stevenson
  • Andrew Cohen

Abstract

Over the last thirty years a large literature has developed that considered the investment opportunities that arise within the REIT (Real Estate Investment Trust) sector. This literature has considered an array of issues, including the relationship and diversification across different REIT sectors (e.g. Chong et al., 2012; Stevenson 2016), the role REITs can play in both real estate (e.g. Stevenson, 2001) and capital market (Liu & Mei, 1992; Lee & Stevenson, 2005) portfolios and also issues relating to international diversification in public real estate. Some papers have considered portfolio trading strategies within REITS (e.g. Cici et al., 2011; Feng et al., 2022; Zhou & Anderson, 2013) and also the analysis of Smart Beta strategies (Guidolin & Pedio, 2019) or the predictability of REIT returns (e.g. Akinsomi et al., 2016; Letdin et al., 2019; Ling et al., 2000; Li & Wang, 1995; Serrano & Hoesli, 2010, Stevenson, 2001). However, the majority of this literature has focused on relatively low-frequency data, on a monthly frequently or less. This paper takes a slightly different approach, focusing on both higher-frequency data, at a daily frequency, and more active trading strategies. The paper utilizes data obtained for the US Equity REIT sector and compares the performance of a variety of trading strategies commonly adopted by active traders. The analysis utilizes data source from Bloomberg and considers the viability of active trading strategies in the US Equity REIT sector. The strategies included consider approaches such as Relative Strength, Momentum and Mean Reversion over a variety of time horizons. The analysis also examines more fundamentally based measures, including Price to FFO (Funds from Operations).

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Stevenson & Andrew Cohen, 2023. "Active Trading Strategy Performance: An Empirical Comparison using US REIT Data," ERES eres2023_112, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2023_112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2023-112
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    REITs; Trading Strategies;

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2023_112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.