Author
Abstract
This paper intends to expand the important debate on the state-market relations highlighting the role of municipal governance in urban regeneration that shapes and stimulates the sustainable development of office market in Manchester through regeneration strategies since the 1960s. This research focuses on the government leadership of key Council leaders’ decision-making process that extends the focus from local planning authorities as market actors (Huerkens, 2015; Adams, 2010) to the political leaders. This research aims to fill the gap of lacking sufficient discussions on the role of municipal leadership in moulding property market through regeneration policy. Also the construction of new regeneration office index sheds light on the market impact of planning policies in sustainable development. Three research methods were employed in this research: firstly, critical assessing the secondary documents such as government planning reports; secondly, conducting semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders; thirdly, a regeneration office database was used to cross-examine the market impact of regeneration policies on its performance over time. The primary findings are (1) The key political leaders and the chief executive had a significant influence and power over the direction of regeneration strategies since there is a close link between a strong leadership and a clear vision. (2) There is a positive connection between a strong leadership and effective policy implementation, which results in planning permissions being granted more speedily for proposed developments. (3) Consequently, it increases the level of certainty and market confidence among developer and investors, which affects the market performance. This research indicates there is positive connectivity between the local planning policies and property market behaviour adding rich insights to the debate on state-market relations in urban regeneration. It also demonstrates that the analysis of leadership in local government helps explain the complex relationships between policy formulation, policy implementation and policy outcomes.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2019_285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.