IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2019_283.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do shorter span high-rise office buildings have a better real estate performance?

Author

Listed:
  • Sofia Dermisi
  • Dario Trabucco

Abstract

Column-to-column structural spans have been increasing in mid-rise and high-rise office buildings from 25 feet to 45-50 feet due to progress in artificial lighting technologies, structural systems, tenant pressures and zoning regulations. The length of free spans has a direct impact on the construction cost and a building’s sustainability, as longer spans require more structural materials to be built. The paper analyzes the relationship between column free spans and market performance (vacancy and rents) of tall office buildings while accounting for LEED certification and Energy Star label status. If evidence confirms that other building characteristics, including post construction sustainability adoption, has a higher impact on an office building marketability, new strategies can be initiated to reduce the structural spans of tall office buildings and therefore their embodied energy, without affecting their market value. The paper focuses on the class A office buildings of more than 600,000 square feet in downtown Chicago. The results suggest that buildings with shorter spans experience more vacancy, while rents do not have any statistically significant relationship with free spans. Additionally, higher LEED points are achieved by buildings with shorter spans.

Suggested Citation

  • Sofia Dermisi & Dario Trabucco, 2019. "Do shorter span high-rise office buildings have a better real estate performance?," ERES eres2019_283, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2019_283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2019-283
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    High-rise office buildings; Structural spans;

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2019_283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.