IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2016_82.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Decision Support Tool for Procurement & Bidding Strategies for ESCO's

Author

Listed:
  • Brano Glumac
  • Falco Zeekaf

Abstract

The energy consumption in the Netherlands is rising significantly, on average 1.09 percent year since 1983 (CBS, 2015). Next to this the European Union (EU) set a target to increase the energy efficiency of the EU by 20% in 2020. This means that in spite of an increase in energy demand, the energy efficiency has to increase. One of the possible outcomes for the energy efficiency problem are Energy Service Companies (ESCos). ESCos basically deliver energy services and other energy efficiency improvement measures. However the Dutch ESCo market is lacking behind in contrary to other European counties. ESCo approaches could be applied in the redevelopment of utility buildings. Nowadays, still large construction companies win tender procedures, to redevelop utility buildings. Building owners’ behavior should experience a transition towards awareness about the benefits of an ESCo approach instead of the traditional process. Therefore this research shall answer the research question: What strategy should ESCos apply under which tender procedure in urban redevelopment projects to increase success chances for an ESCo approach? This research question is answered by combining the research methods Fuzzy Delphi method (FDM) and Game theory. First, a literature review has been conducted to define a list of procurement criteria which are part of ESCo tender procedures. This list has been rated, validated and functioned as input for the FDM questionnaire. Respondents were asked to evaluate the impact of procurement criteria under different game outcomes. Next to this, respondents gave their preferences over the four different game outcomes. The respondents consisted of two homogeneous groups, namely ESCo experts and technical consultants which represent the customers. The results illustrate that both players have the same opinion in the common traditional process, but differentiate in more complex processes. In a most economical attractive tender (MEAT), ESCos should focus on the construction of a solid business case based on energy performance levels and comfort levels for the end-users. The results are captured in a decision support tool. The tool can demonstrate for both parties how the payoff will be react on the in- or exclusion of specific criteria. ESCos can proactively visit customers to illustrate hypothetically the benefits of an ESCo approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Brano Glumac & Falco Zeekaf, 2016. "Decision Support Tool for Procurement & Bidding Strategies for ESCO's," ERES eres2016_82, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2016_82
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2016-82
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2016_82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.