IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2016_48.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Idiosyncratic risk in direct property - a review of the literature

Author

Listed:
  • David Parker

Abstract

The literature concerning idiosyncratic risk in securitised property is relatively extensive compared to that for direct property. While the risk classifications of systematic, unsystematic and specific/idiosyncratic have been proven to exist within direct property portfolios through quantitative analysis, little research has been undertaken to better understand the nature and contribution of specific/idiosyncratic risk. Reflecting portfolio theory, in a direct property portfolio the contribution of specific/idiosyncratic risk can be effectively neutralised through holding a diversified portfolio with a sufficient number of assets. Quantitative research has focused on the appropriate number of assets to be held in the portfolio to neutralise the contribution of specific/idiosyncratic risk but little research has been undertaken to examine the nature of specific/idiosyncratic risk in direct property. The literature tends to gravitate towards specific/idiosyncratic risk as a function of location, building and tenant which, by definition, vary between buildings as two locations can never be identical. However, in a sub-sector such as CBD office, considerable commonality may exist between location, building and tenant to the point of being partially unsystematic risks rather than specific/idiosyncratic risks. For example, all office buildings in the CBD sub-sector have significant locational or spatial similarity, albeit with some minor differences as distance from the core increases. Further, many office buildings in the CBD sub-sector will have significant building similarities, often being on average newer and built to a higher specification than in other areas. Tenant may also have some commonality across office buildings in the CBD sub-sector with generally stronger tenant covenants and generally longer leases than may be found in other areas. Accordingly, in the context of office buildings in the CBD sub-sector, aspects of that previously considered to be specific/idiosyncratic risk may be unsystematic risk. The paper seeks to review and analyse the literature to explore where traditional concepts of specific/idiosyncratic risk as a function of location, building and tenant may be challenged and to posit the hypothesis that specific risk may be different to idiosyncratic risk in the context of office buildings in the CBD sub-sector.

Suggested Citation

  • David Parker, 2016. "Idiosyncratic risk in direct property - a review of the literature," ERES eres2016_48, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2016_48
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2016-48
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2016_48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.