IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2016_340.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Buildings condition assessment: part of appraisal procedure or an independent procedure?

Author

Listed:
  • Kaarel Sahk
  • Jaan Miljan

Abstract

Buildings condition assessment as part of appraisal procedure or an independent procedure, as a solution for professional activity opens up the historical question in a new light and makes it with supplement that the story is not about to do or not to do, but about a sub-activity of independent procedure. In current development is possible to follow the both directions of the question, while the assessment during the appraisal procedure has a double nature, so as may be filled by the appraiser itself or as a sub-activity made by other professional. On the other hand, the buildings condition assessment is an independent one and strongly linked with the customer’s brief for assessment, while the earlier described and valuation based, is only one part of customer’s brief for appraisal. Last situation do not point clearly the role and position of assessment in the discussion and conclusion gave in the summary of appraisal report, contrariwise, the independent assessment underlines an assessment as a mainstream of building conditions explanation. Author’s praxis of co-operation with courts considerably shows that the more clear and acceptable results of buildings condition are scored while we deal with independent procedure. The independency of procedure and linked with it co-activities as part of current contest of Building Code are supporting the target of approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaarel Sahk & Jaan Miljan, 2016. "Buildings condition assessment: part of appraisal procedure or an independent procedure?," ERES eres2016_340, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2016_340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2016-340
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2016_340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.