IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2016_133.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Demand forecast for industrial land. Inaccurate and biased?

Author

Listed:
  • Erik Louw
  • Han Olden

Abstract

Spatial demand forecasts are hardly discussed in the scientific literature. In the real estate literature a lot has been written about forecasting, but most of these studies are about prices and hardly about the amount of real estate that is needed. In this paper we analyse the demand forecasts for industrial land in the Netherlands. These forecasts are part of the Dutch planning process. For each new industrial estate or office park, forecasts have to be made which should provide evidence that there is sufficient demand for such new sites.At first we compare demand forecasts with actual demand. It is concluded that most forecast overestimate demand and that this more often occurs on lower than on higher spatial scales. Secondly, we try to find an explanation for the inaccuracy. This is done by analysing various demand forecasts models on national, regional and local level. This analysis is completed by a review of various second-opinion reports on forecasts and reports by regional and local Courts of Audit about the development of industrial estates. We conclude that the main explanation for the inaccuracies is the assumed success of economic growth policies in the models (either by choosing high growth scenario’s or by assuming successful policy interventions). This implies strategic behaviour of forecasters, planners and politicians and shows resemblance with research on the accuracy of travel demand forecasts.

Suggested Citation

  • Erik Louw & Han Olden, 2016. "Demand forecast for industrial land. Inaccurate and biased?," ERES eres2016_133, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2016_133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2016-133
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2016_133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.