IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2015_127.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Statutory Valuation And The Use Of Automated Valuation Models

Author

Listed:
  • John MacFarlane

Abstract

The requirements for statutory valuations are that they are fair and equitable so that these characteristics also pertain to the taxes based on the valuations. It is also preferable that statutory valuations are close to market values so that there is a reasonable level of transparency in the valuation process and the general public can have confidence in the statutory valuation outcomes.It is also important that the statutory valuation process is relatively inexpensive so that the associated taxes are reasonably efficient.In New South Wales, annual Land Valuations are produced for approximately 2.5 million properties. A very natural question is: “What is the place for Automated Valuation Models (AVMs) and Computer Aided Mass Appraisal (CAMA) in the statutory valuation process?”.The paper will examine this basic question and others which follow from it, including: What is the balance between reduced cost and the consistency and accuracy of valuations?What should be the complexity of the underlying model(s)?What are the associated data requirements for different categories of properties (zonings)?To what properties can an AVM be applied and where should other valuation methods be used?Examples from the NSW land valuation process will be considered.

Suggested Citation

  • John MacFarlane, 2015. "Statutory Valuation And The Use Of Automated Valuation Models," ERES eres2015_127, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2015_127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2015-127
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2015_127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.