IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2012_269.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluating regeneration policies for rundown industrial sites in the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Huub Ploegmakers
  • Pascal Beckers

Abstract

To date, systematic evaluations of regeneration policies and programs for deprived and run-down urban areas which examine whether policy objectives are actually achieved and to what extent this was due to the implementation of that policy or program have been scarce. The dearth of conformance-based evaluations has also been noticed in the wider planning literature. In response to this evaluation gap in planning this paper presents a conformance-based evaluation of regeneration policies for run-down industrial sites in the Netherlands. Regeneration policies and programs for these sites usually involve public provision of infrastructure, public spaces and serviced building land by local authorities. The main objectives of these policies are to promote economic development and to stimulate private investments in buildings. One of the alleged causes of the observed lack of planning evaluations is the absence of an accepted (quantitative) methodology which enables one to attribute observed outcomes to planning activities. This issue has, however, received more attention in the literature on the impact of local economic development policies, which sometimes explicitly incorporate urban regeneration initiatives as they involve targeting incentives at small distressed areas. Although calls have been made for more rigorous evaluations in this research field as well, evaluation methods are more established. A variety of statistical techniques is proposed that could be used to assess whether observed economic outcomes can be attributed to the implementation of the policy (in the case of nonrandomized observational studies). This is normally done by comparing the outcomes in areas (or firms) that are subject to a certain policy or program (the ìtreatmentî group) with comparison groups of areas that are not targeted by this policy (the ìcomparisonîù group). This paper takes up this suggestion and compares the economic outcomes on industrial sites that have been subject to regeneration policies with sites where no regeneration policies have been put into place but which are as similar as possible. This matching is based on the assumption that the probability of regeneration is conditional given certain characteristics of the industrial site. The following indicators have been established to measure the economic outcomes: employment growth, property values and the level of private investments in buildings.

Suggested Citation

  • Huub Ploegmakers & Pascal Beckers, 2012. "Evaluating regeneration policies for rundown industrial sites in the Netherlands," ERES eres2012_269, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2012_269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2012-269
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jasper Beekmans & Pascal Beckers & Erwin van der Krabben & Karel Martens, 2014. "A hedonic price analysis of the value of industrial sites," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 108-130, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2012_269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.