IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2010_370.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparison Of German And Anglo Saxon Real Estate Appraisal Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Tobias Schnaidt
  • Steffen Sebastian

Abstract

There is a continuing discussion whether there is a superior appraisal method and which one it is. The often expected need for a standardized appraisal method for the merging real estate market with its international cross border investments intensifies this discussion. There are some remarkable differences in the appraisal methods in the UK and in Germany. In the past the Anglo Saxon DCF method was considered to be more accurate. Several German surveyors disagree and claim that the German appraisal method with its gross rental value fulfills its purpose. The paper compares the appraisal methods in its bases and shows the remarkable differences. It also analyzes the differences in context of importance for the different markets where the appraisal methods are used. The paper shows that the discussed appraisal methods are comparable if they are used correctly. It is important that the appraisal methods are used in the field they were developed for. For now there is no superior appraisal method. In the end the surveyor has to work with great diligence and he needs transparent data for the valuation.

Suggested Citation

  • Tobias Schnaidt & Steffen Sebastian, 2010. "Comparison Of German And Anglo Saxon Real Estate Appraisal Methods," ERES eres2010_370, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2010_370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2010-370
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2010_370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.