IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2010_350.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Alternative Tenure Options Available To House The Homeless In South Africa: The Case For Not Providing Access To Ownership Of Freehold Property To People Requiring Government Funded Housing

Author

Listed:
  • Graeme Jay
  • François Viruly

Abstract

One of the most serious challenges facing South Africa as a developing country is the number of homeless people who currently do not have access to housing opportunities. The institutionalized policy of apartheid in South Africa during the period 1948 to 1994 created not only segregation based upon race, but also inequalities and inefficiencies in terms of access to economic opportunities. This has no doubt had as a consequence the high rate of unemployment that South Africa is currently experiencing. Many people are reliant on Government assistance in order to obtain access to housing. Such assistance either takes the form of receiving free give-away housing or subsidized funding provided by the Government. A high percentage of South Africaís annual budget is spent on housing programmes. Most of South Africaís housing programmes focus on encouraging people to own their own freehold property. Community based housing schemes sponsored by government in South Africa, like social housing, have largely failed, unlike in many European countries and countries like the US. Although one can naturally understand Governmentís vision of eventually eradicating homelessness, the question that needs to be posed is whether or not South Africa as a country can afford both financially and politically to continue its pursuit of current housing policies. The research for this paper was undertaken in order to: ï Provide an overview of the South African Governmentís current housing policy; ï Research the views and perceptions of a sample of people who would be the beneficiaries of Governmentís policy; ï Apply the principles that have made social housing schemes in European countries successful to the South African environment; ï Suggest alternative tenure options available to Government to house people other than providing access to the ownership of freehold property.

Suggested Citation

  • Graeme Jay & François Viruly, 2010. "Alternative Tenure Options Available To House The Homeless In South Africa: The Case For Not Providing Access To Ownership Of Freehold Property To People Requiring Government Funded Housing," ERES eres2010_350, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2010_350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2010-350
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2010_350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.