IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2010_157.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Incidence Of Compensative Costs For Public Standard Services On The Value Of Areas To Be Transformed In Consolidated Or Central Urban Locations: The Case Of Turin

Author

Listed:
  • Stefania Sabatino
  • Riccardo Roscelli
  • Luisa Ingaramo

Abstract

A key condition for the creation of balanced urban transformations is the introduction of appropriate public standard services beside the new Real Estate developments. The Turin Plan in force indicates that, in urban lots (developing more than 4,000 sq.m. of gross floor area) to be transformed in consolidated and central locations, the areas for public standard services should be given for free. Anyway, the City of Turin can refuse the disposal of an area whenever its shape, location or dimension might compromise the adequate standard allotment. As an alternative, according to the local regulations, the City requests a compensative fee to remunerate the necessary expenditure to fit other more suitable free areas with public services. In this case the private proposer offers to the City a ìcompensative feeî that has to be verified by the Public Body on the basis of the ìright of eminent domainî. The amount of the expropriating compensation had been considered, up to 2007, at the 50% of the area ìmarket valueî (see the Decree n. 327- 8th June 2001). As a consequence, a fair apportionment of the costs and advantages induced by the transformation process between Public and Private subjects had generally been granted. Anyway, during the last three years, some consistent changes took place: their impact on the estimation of the ìcompensative feesî has been so relevant to request a revision of their evaluation criteria. The first reason is related to the conjunctural economic and financial recession, perceived from 2007 in the Real Estate market as well as in the Land one. As the present low mortgage activity is demonstrating, the European Central Bank reduction of the official rate, up to 1,00% (Spring 2009), wasnít helpful. Furthermore, the 2008 national budget Law (Legge Finanziaria n. 244 ñ 24th December 2007) has introduced the ìmarket valueî approach as the new expropriation criterion. In the present economic recession the full 100% market value appreciation for public domain areas, or compensative fee, produces an overcharged variable not more easily sustainable by the Public Body. The paper aims to offer a contribution insight the economical-financial feasibility estimation of Real Estate urban re-developments (carried out through Discounted Cash- Flow dynamic analysis) to identify a market value able to represent a fair ìcompensative feeî for standard public services. Finally we present a compared analysis of some case studies concerning the re-development of former industrial areas in the city of Turin.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefania Sabatino & Riccardo Roscelli & Luisa Ingaramo, 2010. "The Incidence Of Compensative Costs For Public Standard Services On The Value Of Areas To Be Transformed In Consolidated Or Central Urban Locations: The Case Of Turin," ERES eres2010_157, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2010_157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2010-157
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2010_157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.