IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2010_139.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Evolution Of Chinese Office Markets: A Comparison Of Beijing And Shanghai

Author

Listed:
  • Michael White
  • Qiulin Ke

Abstract

The past two decades have witnessed substantial change in the Chinese economy. Consequent upon this has been significant new office development. Beijing and Shanghai are the two largest commercial property markets in China. These two markets emerged since 1990s and have been growing and becoming relatively more transparent. Office stock has increased rapidly in both cities. This has been accompanied by large fluctuations in rental value and vacancy rates. There are similarities and dissimilarities between the two markets in terms of cyclical patterns, oversupply and occupier mix. Shanghai offices are mainly occupied by multi-national companies; while in Beijing, large-scaled state owned Chinese companies take an equal, if not more, important role in developing, investing and occupying office buildings. As the political and administrative centre of China, Beijing office market development may be more influenced by national political and economic factors. This paper examines the performance of office markets in these cities, highlighting the role played by foreign direct investment, differences in occupier mix, and the impact that the amplitude of fluctuation in rents and vacancy rates have on market adjustment processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael White & Qiulin Ke, 2010. "The Evolution Of Chinese Office Markets: A Comparison Of Beijing And Shanghai," ERES eres2010_139, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2010_139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2010-139
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2010_139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.