IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2010_084.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Urban Analysis And Development Studies For The Area Of The Santa Chiara Hospital In The City Of Pisa (Italy): A Comparison Between Different Redevelopment Options

Author

Listed:
  • Sergio Mattia
  • Alessandra Oppio
  • Alessandra Pandolfi

Abstract

This paper describes the use of the Discounted Cash Flow techniques to the 10 proposals for the urban design International Competition ìUrban redevelopment of the hospital university of Santa Chiara, Piazza dei Miracoliî, advertised by the city of Pisa in 2007. The area is strategically placed in the heart of the old city centre of Pisa, immediately nearby the Dome square, listed as Unescoís world heritage site. The Free Discounted Cash Flow (FDCF) model applied to the case study is one of the evaluation methods of the investmentsí economic and financial sustainability broadly used by developers and investors, since it is an approach based on the concept of net operating incomes according to all the financing sources (equity and debts). The FDCF model has been applied to different operating options (selling/renting/managing) not considered in the competitionís proposals, in order to verify their economical and financial performances. Taking into consideration the outcomes obtained these analysis, the most profitable options have been selected considering the information given by the Internal rate of return and the Net present value.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergio Mattia & Alessandra Oppio & Alessandra Pandolfi, 2010. "Urban Analysis And Development Studies For The Area Of The Santa Chiara Hospital In The City Of Pisa (Italy): A Comparison Between Different Redevelopment Options," ERES eres2010_084, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2010_084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2010-084
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2010_084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.