IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2009_246.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Problem of Similar Properties' Bias and Inefficiency in the Sales Comparison Approach of Real Estate Appraisal

Author

Listed:
  • Gunther Maier
  • Shanaka Herath

Abstract

"The sales comparison approach of real estate appraisal derives the estimated value of a subject property from transaction prices of recently sold similar properties in the local market. In this way only a very limited number of available transaction information is utilized in the appraisal. The paper discusses the industry standard from a statistical point of view and derives hypotheses about its implications for the derived appraisals. An alternative approach based on hedonic price concepts is proposed. In the main part of the paper we use simulation techniques to test for the severity of some of the hypothesized implications and to compare the standard method to our alternative method. Based on some assumptions about the real estate market we randomly generate hypothetical transaction data, apply the two alternative approaches to these data and compare the results. As it turns out, the standard approach is generally inferior to the alternative method. The advantage typically is in the lower standard error of the estimates produced by the alternative approach. In certain constellation""

Suggested Citation

  • Gunther Maier & Shanaka Herath, 2009. "The Problem of Similar Properties' Bias and Inefficiency in the Sales Comparison Approach of Real Estate Appraisal," ERES eres2009_246, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2009_246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2009-246
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2009_246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.