IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2009_128.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparing the Benefit of International Assessment Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Maike Buttler
  • Christian Stoy

Abstract

Several assessment tools have appeared, for example, in the Central European Market, which aim to control as well as make public the sustainable quality of real estate. Properties meeting the requirements of such assessment tools are certified with a label. The certificate can then be applied in the marketing strategy of the real estate. However many potential clients such as investors, companies, and real estate managers remain unconvinced that investing in a certificate increases the value of their property. They are, for example, not sure at which phase of the life-cycle (planning, construction and usage), and which type of property would benefit (income, image and reduction of occupancy costs) from the certificates. Do certified properties meeting quality standards as defined by LEED, BREEAM and DGNB vary from each other and from conventional buildings, or does a certification simply bring extra costs to companies, meaning in the end just a new name for the same old quality? Comparing the benefit of International Assessment Methods

Suggested Citation

  • Maike Buttler & Christian Stoy, 2009. "Comparing the Benefit of International Assessment Methods," ERES eres2009_128, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2009_128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2009-128
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2009_128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.