IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2006_109.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Implementing The Ppp Approach Into Education

Author

Listed:
  • Hans Wilhelm Alfen
  • Renate Fruchter
  • Andrea Jungbecker

Abstract

Facing a worldwide growing market for Public Private Partnership projects on national and international level it is understood that there is an increasing need for interdisciplinary and intercultural competences in the teams developing the projects. As project teams are more and more globally distributed also cutting-edge technical solutions for their collaboration is required. This paper describes the efforts of the pbl-Laboratory at Stanford University, USA and the Knowledge Center@Weimar at Bauhaus-University, Germany to implement these professional needs of the PPP market into the education of students as a project based learning experience. The development of this joint effort is presented, the steps taken to implement the Lifecycle approach explained and the experience of the project assessed. For many years the Stanford University has been carrying out the reputable AEC Global Teamwork Project where students of Architecture, Structural Engineering and Construction Management work on an interdisciplinary and intercultural base on complex construction projects. The AEC Project like no other student project contributes to the objective to provide students with the professional skills needed. Five years ago Bauhaus students also joint the program. Since this year the Knowledge Center@Weimar also contributes to the assignment of the project: A fourth discipline, the Financial Advisor, has been implemented into the team in close collaboration between the two institutions. The objective of adding this discipline is to raise the understanding for the change of paradigm to integrated and life cycle cost focused design and planning. Questions to be answered: - How do project teams considering a building's life cycle work differently with respect to concept development, issues discussed in comparison to teams considering the construction phase only? - Do they interact differently among the disciplines? - Do they use the collaboration technologies differently? - What is each disciplines understanding of a buildings life cycle, of risk management? - How does the team integrate the financial advisor? // The paper identifies the steps taken to develop the project assignment considering the real life situation in PPP projects. Thereby, the typical attributes of PPP projects such as life cycle considerations, risk allocation, performance oriented payments and partly output specifications have been implemented. While the team is developing the project their working process and products are observed. A comparison is done showing the differences between a project team considering the construction phase only. On the one hand the AEC Project prepares students for the highly specified requirements and the complexity of PPP projects. On the other hand they also learn project based how to collaborate on international, intercultural and interdisciplinary bases. With the ideas of PPP considering the entire life cycle of a project implemented into education there is a good chance that future projects can be conducted more successfully with a project team understanding how to work globally and to use collaboration technologies to work efficiently.

Suggested Citation

  • Hans Wilhelm Alfen & Renate Fruchter & Andrea Jungbecker, 2006. "Implementing The Ppp Approach Into Education," ERES eres2006_109, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2006_109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2006-109
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2006_109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.