IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/2022_224.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A demonstration case study on the use of living lab and governance for smart city construction and the establishment of a smart solution space

Author

Listed:
  • Heecheol Shim
  • Jaehwan Kim

Abstract

Urban problems in rural small towns in Korea are manifested in various forms, such as the aging of the population, the smart gap, the departure of young people, and the inefficiency of urban space. Accordingly, the state and local governments are presenting various solutions to solve the above urban problems. Among them, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport conducted a public competition project to develop and demonstrate technologies such as smart common cultural space creation, smart education support, smart crime prevention and safety, smart healthcare, and smart information plaza as a way to create a smart city. Based on the project selected in the 2021 public contest, this study collects the opinions of actual residents through the operation of a living lab before the actual smart solution space construction, and based on this, secures the direction for space composition and curriculum development, and applies local customized applications We tried to derive a method for To this end, a living lab was operated prior to the establishment of a smart solution space, and various opinions were shared and collected through the participation of experts in each field, local residents, and universities. Based on the convergence results, the present day problems and local issues of small towns were discovered and served as a test bed to solve them. In addition, in order to further secure the justification and feasibility of building a smart space, the opinions of local residents were actively collected through a total of three surveys. As a result of living lab and governance results and survey analysis results, the necessary services and solutions were built in the order of smart crime prevention, smart healthcare, convenience for living, education support, smart information plaza, smart shelter, and multi-purpose studio. Through this, it was possible to build a space that maximizes the sensibility of actual residents.This study presented a methodology for how to build a resident-led bottom-up development model rather than the central government-led top-down development, and carried out actual demonstration. It is judged that this study can be provided as basic data to some extent in the design of a smart city customized for each region in the future to spread a similar public offering project. Smart cities and proptech following the 4th Industrial Revolution are an irresistible trend, and accordingly, they will become more sophisticated and concrete. Therefore, it is hoped that various results for actual verification through demonstration projects can be drawn, rather than looking at smart cities, living labs, and smart solutions only from an academic point of view, and various policy implications can be derived.

Suggested Citation

  • Heecheol Shim & Jaehwan Kim, 2022. "A demonstration case study on the use of living lab and governance for smart city construction and the establishment of a smart solution space," ERES 2022_224, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:2022_224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/eres-id-eres2022-224
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://architexturez.net/system/files/P_20220531074144_9927.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Construction of space; Governance; Livinglab; Smart Solution;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:2022_224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.